A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Randomized Controlled Positive Psychological Interventions on Subjective and Psychological Well-Being


Koydemir S., Soekmez A. B. , Schuetz A.

APPLIED RESEARCH IN QUALITY OF LIFE, vol.16, no.3, pp.1145-1185, 2021 (Peer-Reviewed Journal) identifier identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 16 Issue: 3
  • Publication Date: 2021
  • Doi Number: 10.1007/s11482-019-09788-z
  • Journal Name: APPLIED RESEARCH IN QUALITY OF LIFE
  • Journal Indexes: Social Sciences Citation Index, Scopus, IBZ Online, Index Islamicus, Psycinfo
  • Page Numbers: pp.1145-1185
  • Keywords: Positive psychology, Positive psychological interventions, Meta-analysis, Well-being, Happiness, LOVING-KINDNESS MEDITATION, NEGATIVE AFFECT SCHEDULE, QUALITY-OF-LIFE, CONTROLLED-TRIAL, COUNTING BLESSINGS, SELF-COMPASSION, SHORT-FORM, EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE, ONLINE INTERVENTIONS, MODERATING ROLE

Abstract

We conducted a meta-analysis to analyze the effects of randomized controlled positive psychological interventions on subjective and psychological well-being. Our aim was to extend previous research by following a more comprehensive approach in the selection of studies, by including new moderators, by focusing on adult nonclinical populations and increases in well-being, and by comparing the effects of interventions targeting subjective and psychological well-being (i.e., hedonism or eudemonia) or a combination of the two. In contrast to previous analyses, we compared effects on different outcomes and contrasted effects of technology-assisted interventions with traditional ones. We included 68 randomized controlled studies of nonclinical populations with a total of 16,085 participants. The results showed that positive psychological interventions do increase well-being. The overall effect size (Cohen's d) was 0.23, but it was 0.08 for psychological well-being, 0.22 for subjective well-being, and 0.43 when the studies targeted both types of well-being. Longer interventions showed stronger immediate effects than shorter ones, and interventions based on traditional methods were more effective than those that used technology-assisted methods. With respect to short-term outcomes, there was a negative relation to age, but when long-term effects were considered, the relation to age was positive. Overall, we also found evidence of long-term effects of the interventions.