Application of bagging in day-ahead electricity price forecasting and factor augmentation


Creative Commons License

Özen K., Yıldırım Kasap D.

Energy Economics, cilt.103, 2021 (SSCI) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 103
  • Basım Tarihi: 2021
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105573
  • Dergi Adı: Energy Economics
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Scopus, International Bibliography of Social Sciences, PASCAL, Periodicals Index Online, ABI/INFORM, Business Source Elite, Business Source Premier, EconLit, Environment Index, INSPEC, PAIS International, Public Affairs Index
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Bagging, Shrinkage methods, Electricity price forecasting, Multivariate modeling, Forecast encompassing, Factor models, ECONOMIC TIME-SERIES, BOOTSTRAP, SELECTION, HETEROSKEDASTICITY, SHRINKAGE, MODEL
  • Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

© 2021 Elsevier B.V.The electricity price forecasting (EPF) is a challenging task not only because of the uncommon characteristics of electricity but also because of the existence of many potential predictors with changing predictive abilities over time. In such an environment, how to account for all available factors and extract as much information as possible is the key to the production of accurate forecasts. To address this long-standing issue in a way that balances complexity and forecasting accuracy while facilitating the traceability of the predictor selection procedure, we propose the method of Bootstrap Aggregation (bagging). To forecast day-ahead electricity prices in a multivariate context for six major power markets, we construct a large-scale pure price model and apply the bagging approach in comparison with the popular Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) estimation method. Our forecasting study reveals that bagging provides substantial forecast improvements on daily and hourly scales in almost all markets over the popular LASSO estimation method. The differentiation in the forecast performances of the two approaches appears to arise, inter alia, from their structural differences in the explanatory variables selection process. Moreover, to account for the intraday hourly dependencies of day-ahead electricity prices, all our models are augmented with latent factors, and a substantial improvement is observed only in the forecasts from models covering a relatively limited number of predictors.