Leveraging Familial Bonds to Resolve the Cuban Missile Crisis: A Case of Unconventional US Governance


Creative Commons License

Yorgun I.

International Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Sciences (IJRHS), cilt.12, sa.07, ss.1-13, 2024 (Hakemli Dergi)

Özet

This study analyzes the unconventional strategies employed by President John F. Kennedy during the Cuban Missile Crisis, with a particular focus on the influential role of his brother. The first aim is to explore how familial bonds were leveraged in high-stakes governance, addressing the gap in scholarly attention regarding the pivotal involvement of President Kennedy's brother in the decision-making process. Despite extensive literature on the crisis, only a handful have written about it, and little has been said about this aspect. The second aim is to elucidate the unorthodox methods used by President Kennedy, especially his delegation of significant responsibilities to his younger brother and confidant (Scott and Hughes, 2015:208), who held no formal defense or diplomatic position. Through a comprehensive analysis of primary sources and seminal works from the Cold War era, the study highlights how Robert F. Kennedy facilitated dynamic discussions within the Executive Committee (ExComm) and conducted confidential negotiations with Soviet officials. The findings reveal that President Kennedy's reliance on his brother and the ExComm, rather than traditional cabinet structures, marked a significant departure from conventional governance practices. During the crisis, the USA and the USSR engaged in a strategic chess game, employing unconventional methods, including back-door diplomacy, to avert catastrophe. This study highlights these dramatic events and underscores the innovative and familial approach to crisis management that defined this pivotal historical period.