Reshaping Environmental Governance: Democratic Innovations in Europe


Medeiros Ribeiro J. D., Falanga R.

European Sociological Association 16th Conference , Porto, Portekiz, 27 - 30 Ağustos 2024, ss.427, (Özet Bildiri)

  • Yayın Türü: Bildiri / Özet Bildiri
  • Basıldığı Şehir: Porto
  • Basıldığı Ülke: Portekiz
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.427
  • Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Adresli: Hayır

Özet

In the wake of the escalating environmental crisis, demo-

cratic innovations (DIs) try to contribute to democratic de-

cision-making through citizen participation. In this paper,

we aim to explore whether and how Dis can help advance

the scholarly debate (and policy practice) of environmen-

tal sustainability. Our findings are based on an extensive

historical review carried out under the EU-funded project

“INCITE-DEM Inclusive Citizenship in a World in Transforma-

tion: Co-Designing for Democracy”. Here we focus on the

345 peer-reviewed articles, supported by interviews with

internationally acknowledged scholars, that delve into the

role of Dis for environmental sustainability in Europe. Our

findings suggest an emerging connection between pro-

cesses like deliberative mini-publics and the Sustainable

Development Goal 13 (Climate Action), which is most likely

based on the role played by climate assemblies in the last few years. Although such assemblies have had some recog-

nition by public bodies, questions remain open about the

impact on the policy agenda and, in particular, the political

uptake of citizens’ recommendations.

Against this backdrop, and by acknowledging the key

themes of RN12 Environment & Society, this paper exam-

ines the role of DIs in setting out the conditions for pol-

icy solutions to emerging environmental challenges, with

a focus on Europe. We believe that the transformative na-

ture of DIs can feed new research on citizen participation

for environmental policies. Yet, we also alert for risks of

over-reliance on initiatives of participation as a panacea for

solutions in the environmental field. A critical appraisal of

strengths and limitations of DIs in environmental policy is

much needed in the scholarly debate, and this paper can

hopefully indicates new pathways for future research.