Diğer, ss.1-252, 2008
This dissertation analyzes the public debate in Kazakhstan on the government’s ethnic return
migration policy. Ethnic return migrations are prone to create public debates because they privilege one
ethnic group over another or others. The implications of ethnic migration policies are particularly important
during periods of political and social transformation, when new elites attempt to redefine the identity of
their states. This dissertation traces the discourse concerning the return of Kazakh oralmans, which
paralleled debates on language and demography; it demonstrates that discussion of these issues provided a
forum for the expression of divergent views on the nature of the identity that should be fostered in
Kazakhstan. As the discourse on language and demography, the debate on ethnic migration served as an
arena for public debate about whether Kazakhstan’s identity should be ethnic or civic. The analysis of the
public debate in Kazakhstan is based primarily on an analysis of print media. Over the 16 years since the
initiation of the ethnic migration policy, both Kazakh- and Russian- language publications have devoted
space to the issues pertinent to the oralman policy. The examination of the debate is also informed by five
months of field work in Kazakhstan that included expert interviews and informal discussions with return
migrants as well as long-time residents in the country. The different perspectives on the return migration
policy reflect deeper divisions between the “nation-state” and “civic-state” visions of Kazakhstan’s future.
“Nation-statists,” seeking to make Kazakhstan the Kazakh homeland, vigorously support ethnic return
migration; “civic-statists,” envisioning a multi-ethnic country, oppose it. The ethnic return policy has
demographic, cultural, and economic implications that would profoundly affect every citizen living in
Kazakhstan. This explains the contentious nature of the debate over the oralman project. And over the time
economic and social concerns may lead the homeland states’ to adopt a more realistic policy tilting towards
civic statists’ position.