Stanislavski Studies, 2026 (ESCI, Scopus)
This study investigates the conceptual and operative parallels between Stanislavsky’s methods and the architectural design process based on architecture and theatre’s shared engagement with human life: architecture designs spaces for life, and theatre represents life situations. The study introduces vitalness as a term to describe architecture and theatre’s shared capacity to contain a dynamic life flow within a multi-layered milieu; it articulates the term through two components–the human being and its phenomenal environment–and examines how it is generated in these disciplines. Arguing that architects think like actors in the design process to envision vitalness, the study proposes that Stanislavsky’s acting methods can benefit architects’ imaginative reasoning. Employing a theoretical and critical analytical methodology, the study surveys the literature to identify architecture and theatre’s common ground and proposes a conceptual framework of vitalness which underscores the two Stanislavskian concepts aligned with the components of vitalness: given circumstances and magic if. The study lastly analyses the creative production processes with a focus on the parallels between Stanislavsky’s method and the architectural design process. This analysis proposes a Stanislavskian lens to spatial design and serves as a systematic standpoint to creativity and imagination, facilitating human-based thinking across disciplinary boundaries.