Precoder Design For Multi-Group Multicasting With a Common Message

Creative Commons License

Yalcin A. Z., YÜKSEL TURGUT A. M.

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS, cilt.67, sa.10, ss.7302-7315, 2019 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 67 Sayı: 10
  • Basım Tarihi: 2019
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1109/tcomm.2019.2931580
  • Dergi Adı: IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.7302-7315
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Common and private data transmission, multicast transmission, multiple input multiple output, physical layer precoding, superposition coding, SUM-RATE MAXIMIZATION, MIMO BROADCAST, CHANNEL
  • Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Adresli: Hayır

Özet

This paper considers precoding for multi-group multicasting with a common message. The multiple antenna base station communicates with K clusters, each with L users. There is a common message destined to all users and a private multicast message for each cluster. We study the weighted sum rate (WSR) maximization problem for two different schemes: 1) the base station transmits the superposition of common and multicast messages and 2) the base station concatenates the multicast message vector with the common message. We also formulate a second problem, weighted minimum mean square error (WMMSE) minimization, and prove that WSR maximization and WMMSE minimization are equivalent at the optimal solution. Inspired by the WMMSE problem, we suggest a suboptimal algorithm, based on alternating optimization. We apply this algorithm to the two transmission schemes and understand that there is a fundamental difference between the two. We compare the results with maximal ratio transmission (MRT) and zero-forcing (ZF) precoding and investigate the effects of the number of base station antennas, the number of groups, and the number of users in a group. Finally, we study imperfect successive interference cancellation (SIC) at the receivers and show that the first transmission scheme is more robust.