Minimum resale price maintenance in EU in the aftermath of the US Leegin decision

Creative Commons License

Haziroglu E. C., Gokatalay S.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF LAW AND ECONOMICS, cilt.42, sa.1, ss.45-71, 2016 (SSCI) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 42 Sayı: 1
  • Basım Tarihi: 2016
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1007/s10657-015-9517-9
  • Dergi Adı: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF LAW AND ECONOMICS
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.45-71
  • Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Leegin decision of the Supreme Court in 2007 affirmed that minimum RPM was to be evaluated under the rule of reason henceforth. Conversely, minimum RPM retains its position as a hard-core restraint in EU's BER 2010 and the De Minimis Notice. The limited amount of case law reveal that in the absence of certain factors, such as significant market power of the parties, minimum RPM is unlikely to result in the detriment of consumers. Consequently, despite the retention of the maintenance of the single market as a significant aim in EU competition policy, minimum RPM practices are entitled to a more lenient approach, if the ultimate aim is to attain consumer welfare as stated by the Commission and through most judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union.