There is no generalizability crisis Comment

Creative Commons License

Lakens D., UYGUN TUNÇ D., Tunc M. N.

BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, cilt.45, 2022 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Editöre Mektup
  • Cilt numarası: 45
  • Basım Tarihi: 2022
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1017/s0140525x21000340
  • Dergi Adı: BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, IBZ Online, International Bibliography of Social Sciences, Agricultural & Environmental Science Database, BIOSIS, Communication & Mass Media Index, EMBASE, INSPEC, Linguistic Bibliography, Linguistics & Language Behavior Abstracts, MEDLINE, MLA - Modern Language Association Database, Psycinfo, Sociological abstracts
  • Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Falsificationist and confirmationist approaches provide two well-established ways of evaluating generalizability. Yarkoni rejects both and invents a third approach we call neo-operationalism. His proposal cannot work for the hypothetical concepts psychologists use, because the universe of operationalizations is impossible to define, and hypothetical concepts cannot be reduced to their operationalizations. We conclude that he is wrong in his generalizability-crisis diagnosis.