MREIT experiments with 200 μA injected currents: a feasibility study using two reconstruction algorithms, SMM and harmonic <i>B<sub>Z</sub></i>


Arpinar V. E., Hamamura M. J., EYÜBOĞLU B. M., Muftuler L. T.

PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, cilt.57, sa.13, ss.4245-4261, 2012 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 57 Sayı: 13
  • Basım Tarihi: 2012
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/13/4245
  • Dergi Adı: PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.4245-4261
  • Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Adresli: Hayır

Özet

Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) is a technique that produces images of conductivity in tissues and phantoms. In this technique, electrical currents are applied to an object and the resulting magnetic flux density is measured using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the conductivity distribution is reconstructed using these MRI data. Currently, the technique is used in research environments, primarily studying phantoms and animals. In order to translate MREIT to clinical applications, strict safety standards need to be established, especially for safe current limits. However, there are currently no standards for safe current limits specific to MREIT. Until such standards are established, human MREIT applications need to conform to existing electrical safety standards in medical instrumentation, such as IEC601. This protocol limits patient auxiliary currents to 100 mu A for low frequencies. However, published MREIT studies have utilized currents 10-400 times larger than this limit, bringing into question whether the clinical applications of MREIT are attainable under current standards. In this study, we investigated the feasibility of MREIT to accurately reconstruct the relative conductivity of a simple agarose phantom using 200 mu A total injected current and tested the performance of two MREIT reconstruction algorithms. These reconstruction algorithms used are the iterative sensitivity matrix method (SMM) by Ider and Birgul (1998 Elektrik 6 215-25) with Tikhonov regularization and the harmonic B-Z proposed by Oh et al (2003 Magn. Reason. Med. 50 875-8). The reconstruction techniques were tested at both 200 mu A and 5 mA injected currents to investigate their noise sensitivity at low and high current conditions. It should be noted that 200 mu A total injected current into a cylindrical phantom generates only 14.7 mu A current in imaging slice. Similarly, 5 mA total injected current results in 367 mu A in imaging slice. Total acquisition time for 200 mu A and 5 mA experiments was about 1 h and 8.5 min, respectively. The results demonstrate that conductivity imaging is possible at low currents using the suggested imaging parameters and reconstructing the images using iterative SMM with Tikhonov regularization, which appears to be more tolerant to noisy data than harmonic B-Z.