On lie detection "Wizards"


BOND C. F. , Uysal A.

LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, vol.31, no.1, pp.109-115, 2007 (Peer-Reviewed Journal) identifier identifier identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 31 Issue: 1
  • Publication Date: 2007
  • Doi Number: 10.1007/s10979-006-9016-1
  • Journal Name: LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR
  • Journal Indexes: Social Sciences Citation Index, Scopus
  • Page Numbers: pp.109-115
  • Keywords: deception detection, CATCH, DECEPTION, JUDGMENTS, TRUTH

Abstract

M. O'Sullivan and P. Ekman (2004) claim to have discovered 29 wizards of deception detection. The present commentary offers a statistical critique of the evidence for this claim. Analyses reveal that chance can explain results that the authors attribute to wizardry. Thus, by the usual statistical logic of psychological research, O'Sullivan and Ekman's claims about wizardry are gratuitous. Even so, there may be individuals whose wizardry remains to be uncovered. Thus, the commentary outlines forms of evidence that are (and are not) capable of diagnosing lie detection wizardry.