A comparative study of autoregressive neural network hybrids


Creative Commons License

Taskaya-Temizel T. , CASEY M.

NEURAL NETWORKS, vol.18, pp.781-789, 2005 (Journal Indexed in SCI) identifier identifier identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 18
  • Publication Date: 2005
  • Doi Number: 10.1016/j.neunet.2005.06.003
  • Title of Journal : NEURAL NETWORKS
  • Page Numbers: pp.781-789
  • Keywords: hybrid architectures, seasonal time series, time-delay neural networks, ARIMA, TIME-SERIES, FORECASTS, ARIMA

Abstract

Many researchers have argued that combining many models for forecasting gives better estimates than single time series models. For example, a hybrid architecture comprising an autoregressive integrated moving average model (ARIMA) and a neural network is a well-known technique that has recently been shown to give better forecasts by taking advantage of each model's capabilities. However, this assumption carries the danger of underestimating the relationship between the model's linear and non-linear components, particularly by assuming that individual forecasting techniques are appropriate, say, for modeling the residuals. In this paper, we show that such combinations do not necessarily outperform individual forecasts. On the contrary, we show that the combined forecast can underperform significantly compared to its constituents' performances. We demonstrate this using nine data sets, autoregressive linear and time-delay neural network models. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.