Design Reuse Via Automated Requirements-Driven Retrieval: A Framework for Electronic Hardware


Uyar E. B., Gokce C., Gursoy A. E., TAŞKAYA TEMİZEL T.

Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, cilt.26, sa.7, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 26 Sayı: 7
  • Basım Tarihi: 2026
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1115/1.4071107
  • Dergi Adı: Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Compendex, INSPEC
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: domain-expert-in-the-loop, electronic design, metadata extraction, multimodal LLMs, requirement-driven retrieval, retrieval-augmented generation, SPLADE sparse–lexical retrieval
  • Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Design reuse accelerates hardware development by improving efficiency, reducing costs, and shortening time-to-market. However, retrieving reusable circuit blocks directly from natural-language requirements remains challenging, particularly in confidentiality-driven low-resource domains with heterogeneous artifacts and nonstandard representations. We introduce a structured framework for requirement-driven retrieval tailored to these constraints, combining dataset curation, sparse lexical search, semantic reranking, and a large language model (LLM) for final candidate block selection. To support this, we introduce Requirements, Retrieval, Reuse: a structured electronics dataSET (R3SET) that links 338 real-world hardware requirements to 92 reusable circuit blocks extracted from eight open-source hardware projects. Each block is described using expert-reviewed, LLM-assisted metadata authoring. To simulate realistic retrieval conditions, R3SET also includes 100 synthetic distractor blocks derived from vendor artifacts. To our knowledge, it is the first dataset linking requirements to reusable electronics at this level of granularity. Evaluated on R3SET, the hybrid retriever achieves 71% Hit@1 and 92% Hit@5 on the one-to-one subset (n = 271), where each requirement corresponds to a single circuit block. On the full dataset including cases without a matching block (n = 328), the LLM slightly outperformed the retriever’s top-1 accuracy (60.1% versus 58.5%) while generating decision rationales intended to support explainability. This study contributes a structured, low-resource-compatible framework for modeling requirement-to-block reuse and outlines future directions in automated input-elicitation, composite retrieval, and schematic segmentation.