Response of the submerged macrophyte<i> Stuckenia</i><i> pectinata</i> (L.) Borner to warming in different climate regions: A synchronized oligohaline mesocosm experiment


Billah M. M., Yılmaz G., ALVES AMORIM C., Kuyumcu M., Arıkan O., KORKMAZ M., ...More

AQUATIC BOTANY, vol.198, 2025 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 198
  • Publication Date: 2025
  • Doi Number: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2024.103855
  • Journal Name: AQUATIC BOTANY
  • Journal Indexes: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, PASCAL, Aqualine, Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA), BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, Environment Index, Pollution Abstracts, Veterinary Science Database
  • Keywords: Functional traits, Macrophyte dynamics, Plant biochemistry, Rising temperatures, Shallow lakes, Stoichiometry
  • Middle East Technical University Affiliated: Yes

Abstract

Submerged macrophytes play a crucial role as primary producers and contribute essential ecosystem functions and services, but rising temperatures caused by climate change may alter their functional traits. We aimed to assess the effects of simulated climate warming (4.5 degrees C) on the functional trait responses of a submerged macrophyte, Stuckenia pectinata (L.) Borner, in a synchronized oligohaline (4 ppt salinity) mesocosm experiment conducted in two different climate regions in Turkey: cold semi-arid Ankara and hot, dry Mediterranean Mersin. The experiment was conducted using eight mesocosms at each site, with four replicates of each ambient temperature and warming treatment. Each mesocosm held 5000 L and was inoculated with natural sediment, plankton, macroinvertebrate and fish communities to represent natural oligohaline lake ecosystem. S. pectinata shoots collected from a single population from a coastal lake in Mersin were also inoculated in all mesocosms in similar abundances. Overall, we observed significant differences in macrophyte functional traits between the two sites with different climates, albeit with less pronounced effects of a 4.5 degrees C rise in temperature within each site. Specifically, higher macrophyte percent volume infested (PVI) and canopy height were observed in the warmer Mersin than in the colder Ankara, which we attributed to higher shading by phytoplankton (reflected by water column Chlorophyll a, Chl-a). The biomass ratio (%dry weight (DW)/wet weight (WW)) was notably higher in Ankara, suggesting that the macrophytes in Ankara acquired relatively more resources than those in Mersin. The pronounced differences between the two sites likely reflected not only temperature differences but also cascading ecosystem characteristics (e.g., water column Chl-a, water nutrients) due to climatic differences.