Mülkiye Dergisi, cilt.43, sa.3, ss.599-624, 2019 (Hakemli Dergi)
This article develops a new framework that explains how academic
inbreeding structures and practices produce institutional habitus and generate
forms of institutional micro structures and practices at higher education
institutions. In this study, we try to map the territory of institutional
habitus with tracing its link to academic inbreeding practices and attempt to
refine its encounters in diverse spheres of institutional life and higher
education. In the first part, we review the current literature on academic
inbreeding that recognizes its permeability and contested meanings through
developing a connection with the concept of institutional habitus. The
literature review part, first, aims to provide the overall picture of
inbreeding practices in higher education institutions (HEI’s) with addressing
its functional as well as cultural roles. Then, it aims to question and extend
the effects of inbreeding on population through engaging in different
disciplinary fields, such as biology and philosophy.In this light, the
discussion on the contested meanings and functionalities of inbreeding system
has blossomed under the guidance of current scholarly literature, which,
meanwhile, requires careful attention to the complex and dependent linkages
between discourses of functionality in inbreeding practices and forms of
institutional life in academic culture within which all these scientific
productivities and relational discourses are deployed. In the second part of
the article, based on the concept of institutional habitus, we explicate and
locate the effects of inbreeding practices within the institutional units and
examine in what extent academic inbreeding produce, reproduce, and drives the
practices of institutional habitus-for example in terms of cohesive institutional relations, group
identity formations and practices, institutional loyalty and emotions,
discourses of scientific productivity, internal pockets of research
territories, and forms of institutional dispositions. In the final part, we summarize
the main concerns about academic inbreeding and how it functions in higher
education institutions. As these sources and discussions point out, a growing
body of literature focusing on the patterns and practices of inbreeding
mechanism contribute to the understanding of how diverse and relational its
institutional functions.
Keywords: academic inbreeding, institutional habitus, symbolic boundaries,
higher education institutions
This article develops a new framework that explains how academic
inbreeding structures and practices produce institutional habitus and generate
forms of institutional micro structures and practices at higher education
institutions. In this study, we try to map the territory of institutional
habitus with tracing its link to academic inbreeding practices and attempt to
refine its encounters in diverse spheres of institutional life and higher
education. In the first part, we review the current literature on academic
inbreeding that recognizes its permeability and contested meanings through
developing a connection with the concept of institutional habitus. The
literature review part, first, aims to provide the overall picture of
inbreeding practices in higher education institutions (HEI’s) with addressing
its functional as well as cultural roles. Then, it aims to question and extend
the effects of inbreeding on population through engaging in different
disciplinary fields, such as biology and philosophy.In this light, the
discussion on the contested meanings and functionalities of inbreeding system
has blossomed under the guidance of current scholarly literature, which,
meanwhile, requires careful attention to the complex and dependent linkages
between discourses of functionality in inbreeding practices and forms of
institutional life in academic culture within which all these scientific
productivities and relational discourses are deployed. In the second part of
the article, based on the concept of institutional habitus, we explicate and
locate the effects of inbreeding practices within the institutional units and
examine in what extent academic inbreeding produce, reproduce, and drives the
practices of institutional habitus-for example in terms of cohesive institutional relations, group
identity formations and practices, institutional loyalty and emotions,
discourses of scientific productivity, internal pockets of research
territories, and forms of institutional dispositions. In the final part, we summarize
the main concerns about academic inbreeding and how it functions in higher
education institutions. As these sources and discussions point out, a growing
body of literature focusing on the patterns and practices of inbreeding
mechanism contribute to the understanding of how diverse and relational its
institutional functions.
Keywords: academic inbreeding, institutional habitus, symbolic boundaries,
higher education institutions