International Journal of Steel Structures, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)
This study investigates and compares the relative cost-efficiency and seismic performance of two stability design approaches: the effective length method (ELM) and the direct analysis method (DM). Four steel special frames are first optimized for minimum weight under both design approaches using a recently developed design-driven optimization technique called capacity controlled search (CCS). The constraints governing each design, such as demand-to-capacity ratios and inter-story drift constraint ratios, are identified and presented. Subsequently, the seismic performance of the optimum designs is assessed by a nonlinear static procedure in compliance with ASCE/SEI 41-13. Finally, the results are compared to identify which stability design method leads to more economical and seismically resilient designs in general.