Tie system to upgrade out-of-plane performance of infill masonry walls


Choi H., Nakano Y., Sanada Y., Matsukawa K., Gülkan P., BİNİCİ B.

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol.53, no.5, pp.1841-1862, 2024 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 53 Issue: 5
  • Publication Date: 2024
  • Doi Number: 10.1002/eqe.4096
  • Journal Name: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics
  • Journal Indexes: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, PASCAL, Aerospace Database, Applied Science & Technology Source, Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA), Communication Abstracts, Compendex, Computer & Applied Sciences, Geobase, INSPEC, Metadex, DIALNET, Civil Engineering Abstracts
  • Page Numbers: pp.1841-1862
  • Keywords: in-plane behavior, out-of-plane behavior, reinforced concrete (RC) frame, shaking table test, tie system, unreinforced masonry (URM) wall
  • Middle East Technical University Affiliated: Yes

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to investigate the out-of-plane behavior of unreinforced masonry (URM) infill walls and to identify the effectiveness of tie systems that were proposed to enhance the infill stability under both in- and out-of-plane effects. This study examined three types of tie systems: a full-length tie system (prototype), a staggered tie system and a half-length tie system. For this purpose, four 1/4-scale, single-story, one-bay masonry infilled reinforced concrete (RC) frame specimens with and without the proposed tie systems were sequentially tested under in-plane static cyclic loading and out-of-plane dynamic excitation. In the experimental study, two series of shaking table tests were conducted to investigate the out-of-plane behavior of the infill walls. The first series compared the fundamental out-of-plane performance of three proposed tie systems, and the second series verified the effectiveness of the full-length tie system to prevent infill out-of-plane failure under an excitation simulating the severe floor response in medium-rise buildings. The test results indicated the following: (1) the presence of the tie systems caused minor differences in the in-plane capacity and ductility of each specimen, (2) the effectiveness of the full-length and staggered tie systems was superior to that of the half-length tie system, and (3) the full-length tie system not only prevented the infill out-of-plane failure but also significantly reduced the infill damage under realistic excitation conditions. The above research outcomes provide a useful contribution of the infill to upgrade the seismic resistance of buildings.