Thesis Type: Doctorate
Institution Of The Thesis: Middle East Technical University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Psychology, Turkey
Approval Date: 2020
Thesis Language: English
Student: FULYA KIRIMER AYDINLI
Co-Supervisor: Nebi Sümer
Supervisor: Başak Şahin Acar
Abstract:
In three consecutive studies, the current dissertation investigated the roles of
proactive and reactive sensitivity in adult romantic relationships from a cross-cultural
perspective and the roles of attachment orientations in understanding potential
differences in partner/spouse sensitivity. In the first study, the psychometric
properties of partner sensitivity and perceived partner sensitivity measures were
tested on married participants in Turkey (N = 297). Although two types of sensitivity
were obtained, there was a high correlation between the subscales that called for
further studies. In the second study, the sensitivity measure was converted into a
binary forced-choice scenario-based scale, and thus, categorical sensitivity variables
were obtained. A dyadic study was conducted with married couples in Turkey (N =
112 couples). The psychometric quality of the revised scale was satisfactory, and
proactive sensitivity was positively associated with the indicators of relationship
functioning. Wives with high attachment avoidance and husbands with high attachment anxiety perceived their spouses‟ proactive sensitivity negatively. Wives‟
attachment avoidance also predicted husbands‟ perceived proactive sensitivity. In the
third study, a cross-cultural study was conducted with married/cohabiting individuals
in Turkey (N = 201) and the United States (N = 224). The measure was partially
invariant across the samples. Contrary to expectations, reactive sensitivity was the
predominant pattern in Turkey, while both proactive and reactive sensitivity were
common in the US. As expected, women were perceived as more proactively
sensitive than men. Attachment avoidance was the major predictor of both types of
sensitivity in Turkey and proactive sensitivity in the US. Cultural implications of the
findings and suggestions for further research were discussed.