Eroglu, H. H. And EYÜBOĞLU, B. M. 2016. Two alternatives for magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography: injected or induced current. PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT , vol.37, no.11 , 2024-2049.

Eroglu, H. H., & EYÜBOĞLU, B. M., (2016). Two alternatives for magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography: injected or induced current. PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT , vol.37, no.11, 2024-2049.

Eroglu, Hasan, And BEHÇET MURAT EYÜBOĞLU. "Two alternatives for magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography: injected or induced current," PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT , vol.37, no.11, 2024-2049, 2016

Eroglu, Hasan H. And EYÜBOĞLU, BEHÇET M. . "Two alternatives for magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography: injected or induced current." PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT , vol.37, no.11, pp.2024-2049, 2016

Eroglu, H. H. And EYÜBOĞLU, B. M. (2016) . "Two alternatives for magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography: injected or induced current." PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT , vol.37, no.11, pp.2024-2049.

@article{article, author={Hasan H. Eroglu And author={BEHÇET MURAT EYÜBOĞLU}, title={Two alternatives for magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography: injected or induced current}, journal={PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT}, year=2016, pages={2024-2049} }