Raju, N. Et Al. 1999. Accuracy of population validity and cross-validity estimation: An empirical comparison of formula-based, traditional empirical, and equal weights procedures. APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT , vol.23, no.2 , 99-115.

Raju, N., Bilgic, R., Edwards, J., & Fleer, P., (1999). Accuracy of population validity and cross-validity estimation: An empirical comparison of formula-based, traditional empirical, and equal weights procedures. APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT , vol.23, no.2, 99-115.

Raju, NS Et Al. "Accuracy of population validity and cross-validity estimation: An empirical comparison of formula-based, traditional empirical, and equal weights procedures," APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT , vol.23, no.2, 99-115, 1999

Raju, NS Et Al. "Accuracy of population validity and cross-validity estimation: An empirical comparison of formula-based, traditional empirical, and equal weights procedures." APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT , vol.23, no.2, pp.99-115, 1999

Raju, N. Et Al. (1999) . "Accuracy of population validity and cross-validity estimation: An empirical comparison of formula-based, traditional empirical, and equal weights procedures." APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT , vol.23, no.2, pp.99-115.

@article{article, author={NS Raju Et Al. }, title={Accuracy of population validity and cross-validity estimation: An empirical comparison of formula-based, traditional empirical, and equal weights procedures}, journal={APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT}, year=1999, pages={99-115} }