E. Kalafat Et Al. , "Is umbilicocerebral ratio better than cerebroplacental ratio for predicting adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes?," American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology , vol.223, no.3, pp.462-463, 2020
Kalafat, E. Et Al. 2020. Is umbilicocerebral ratio better than cerebroplacental ratio for predicting adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes?. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology , vol.223, no.3 , 462-463.
Kalafat, E., Kalaylioglu, Z., Thilaganathan, B., & Khalil, A., (2020). Is umbilicocerebral ratio better than cerebroplacental ratio for predicting adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes?. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology , vol.223, no.3, 462-463.
Kalafat, ERKAN Et Al. "Is umbilicocerebral ratio better than cerebroplacental ratio for predicting adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes?," American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology , vol.223, no.3, 462-463, 2020
Kalafat, ERKAN Et Al. "Is umbilicocerebral ratio better than cerebroplacental ratio for predicting adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes?." American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology , vol.223, no.3, pp.462-463, 2020
Kalafat, E. Et Al. (2020) . "Is umbilicocerebral ratio better than cerebroplacental ratio for predicting adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes?." American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology , vol.223, no.3, pp.462-463.
@article{article, author={ERKAN KALAFAT Et Al. }, title={Is umbilicocerebral ratio better than cerebroplacental ratio for predicting adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes?}, journal={American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology}, year=2020, pages={462-463} }